Country Water Profile

Water Risk in India

SDG 6.4.2 water stress: 66.5% · WRI Aqueduct baseline water stress: Extremely High (>80%) · At least basic drinking water: 95.7% · Drought exposure: Medium - High (0.6-0.8)

India has 66.5% SDG 6.4.2 water stress in the latest available FAO AQUASTAT reading, while WRI Aqueduct classifies baseline water stress as Extremely High (>80%). WHO/UNICEF JMP estimates at least basic drinking-water access at 95.7% and safely managed drinking water at 76.4%. WRI Aqueduct adds a baseline drought exposure signal of Medium - High (0.6-0.8).

India’s water risk is long-term and structural, driven mainly by high water stress, agricultural demand, drought exposure, and groundwater pressure.

Water stress

66.5%

FAO AQUASTAT • 2022

Basic drinking water

95.7%

WHO/UNICEF JMP • 2024

Agricultural water use

90.4%

FAO AQUASTAT • 2022

Population

1.5B

World Bank • 2024

Aqueduct category

Extremely High (>80%)

WRI Aqueduct • Baseline

Key Takeaway

The main takeaway for India

India’s water risk is a long-term structural challenge shaped by high water stress, agriculture-led demand, drought exposure, groundwater pressure, and uneven drinking-water service quality. Basic drinking water access is widespread, but India still faces important risks around irrigation demand, climate variability, groundwater use, service reliability, and long-term water security.

Key Indicators

What the main numbers say about India

Water Stress

66.5%

Source FAO AQUASTAT

Year 2022

Detail SDG 6.4.2 Water Stress

Basic Drinking Water Access

95.7%

Source WHO/UNICEF JMP

Year 2024

Detail At least basic drinking water

Agricultural Water Use

90.4%

Source FAO AQUASTAT

Year 2022

Detail Agricultural water withdrawal as % of total water withdrawal

Population

1.5B

Source World Bank

Year 2024

Detail World Bank indicator SP.POP.TOTL

Visual summary

India water risk profile infographic

A visual summary of India water stress, drinking-water access, agricultural water use, drought exposure, groundwater pressure, sanitation, and urban-rural service quality.

India Water Risk Profile infographic showing 66.5% water stress, extremely high WRI Aqueduct baseline water stress, 95.7% basic drinking water access, 76.4% safely managed drinking water, 90.4% agricultural water use, Medium-High drought exposure, significant groundwater pressure, and 1.5B population.
India Water Risk Profile infographic summarizing water stress, drinking-water access, agricultural water use, drought exposure, groundwater pressure, sanitation, and urban-rural service differences.

Water Access and Service Quality

Water access, sanitation and service quality

This section brings together headline access, service quality, sanitation, hygiene, and the biggest access gaps.

What stands out most clearly

Water stress remains structurally high

The latest public indicators show 66.5% water stress, suggesting that pressure is not just episodic but tied to long-term demand, supply limits, and wider resource management.

Agriculture dominates water demand

Agriculture accounts for 90.4% of total water withdrawal, making it the single most important driver of national water pressure and a key factor in long-term system strain.

Access and pressure tell different stories

Basic drinking water access reaches 95.7%, but high access does not remove underlying resource stress, because reliability, service quality, and regional differences can still remain significant.

Drought adds volatility

A drought exposure rating of Medium - High (0.6-0.8) means climate variability remains an important part of the national risk picture and can turn existing pressure into sharper disruption during dry periods.

Headline access

Headline access figures do not tell the whole story. This breakdown shows how baseline access, service quality, and urban-rural differences shape the real picture.

Basic access

95.7%

WHO/UNICEF JMP • 2024

Safely managed

76.4%

WHO/UNICEF JMP • 2024

Sanitation and hygiene conditions

Safely managed drinking water

76.4%

Shows the share of the population with a higher-quality drinking water service than basic access alone.

Sanitation service level

Basic: 83.4% • Safely managed: 62.8%

Shows whether sanitation access keeps pace with drinking water access and whether service quality remains uneven.

Open defecation

6.7%

Helps show whether sanitation access gaps still translate into major health and dignity risks.

Basic handwashing access

89.7%

Adds hygiene context and helps show whether household-level service conditions support public health resilience.

Urban and rural differences

Basic drinking water: urban vs rural

Urban: 97.1% • Rural: 94.9%

Shows whether headline access hides a meaningful urban-rural inequality.

Safely managed drinking water: urban vs rural

Urban: 83% • Rural: 72.6%

Shows whether service quality gaps remain sharper outside cities even when basic access is relatively high.

Where the biggest gaps appear

The most useful signals often sit in the gaps between access, service quality, geography, and resource pressure.

Basic vs safely managed

19.3 percentage points

The gap between basic access and safely managed service shows where headline access still overstates full service quality.

Stress vs access

29.2 percentage points

Comparing water stress with access helps show whether infrastructure outcomes are masking deeper resource pressure.

Overview

The overall country profile

India shows 66.5% SDG 6.4.2 water stress in the latest FAO AQUASTAT reading. The SDG threshold band is Medium (SDG 6.4.2 threshold). This percentage-based SDG indicator should be interpreted separately from WRI Aqueduct’s baseline water-stress category, which classifies India as Extremely High (>80%).

Basic drinking water access is 95.7%, while service quality and reliability can still vary below headline access figures.

Drought exposure is classified as Medium - High (0.6-0.8), while groundwater pressure is described as significant groundwater pressure. Together these factors can make water stress harder to manage across seasons and regions.

Water Data Snapshot

A quick reference table

These indicators show where water pressure comes from, how it affects access, and how each metric should be interpreted in context.

Snapshot table for India showing value, source, and year where available.
Indicator Value Source Year What it means
Population 1.5B World Bank 2024 Shows the scale of demand that water systems must serve.
Water stress 66.5% FAO AQUASTAT 2022 Shows how much pressure water withdrawals place on available resources.
Basic drinking water access 95.7% WHO/UNICEF JMP 2024 Shows how many people have at least basic drinking water access, but not full service quality on its own.
Agricultural water use share 90.4% FAO AQUASTAT 2022 Shows how strongly national water demand is concentrated in agriculture.
Drought exposure Medium - High (0.6-0.8) WRI Aqueduct Baseline Shows how strongly climate variability can intensify water supply pressure.
Groundwater pressure Significant groundwater pressure FAO AQUASTAT 2022 Shows how strongly the country depends on stressed groundwater resources.
Aqueduct water stress category Extremely High (>80%) WRI Aqueduct Baseline Shows WRI’s comparative risk category and should not be read as the same metric as FAO water stress %.
SDG 6.4.2 threshold band Medium (SDG 6.4.2 threshold) FAO AQUASTAT / SDG 6.4.2 Shows the SDG threshold band only; interpret it separately from WRI Aqueduct baseline water stress, which classifies India as Extremely High (>80%).

Main Pressures

Why water pressure builds and what it means

This section combines the main drivers, pressure points, visible effects, and key takeaways.

The strongest pressure points

Agriculture

90.4% • Very high agriculture pressure

Agriculture is a major driver of water demand, accounting for 90.4% of total water withdrawal. This increases sensitivity to irrigation demand, rainfall variability, and seasonal shortages.

Groundwater

Significant groundwater pressure • High groundwater pressure

Groundwater pressure is significant in several regions, which means underground water reserves remain an important support system but also a growing long-term constraint where demand stays high.

Drought Variability

Medium - High (0.6-0.8) • Elevated drought risk

Drought exposure is elevated, which increases vulnerability to rainfall variability, supply disruption, and longer dry periods.

Main causes

High water demand

India faces sustained water strain because agriculture, households, cities, and industry all compete for limited freshwater resources. With national water stress at 66.5%, high demand is not only a dry-season problem; it is a structural part of India’s long-term water-risk profile.

Agricultural water demand

Agriculture is the main driver of India’s water demand, accounting for 90.4% of total water withdrawals. This keeps irrigation needs high and makes farming one of the biggest forces behind India’s long-term water stress, especially in regions that depend on seasonal rainfall, groundwater, or large-scale irrigation systems.

Drought and climate variability

Drought exposure and climate variability make India’s water supply less reliable during dry periods. In an already stressed system, drought can increase strain on irrigation, drinking-water reliability, groundwater reserves, and regional water security rather than acting as a short-term shock alone.

Groundwater stress

Groundwater helps balance India’s water supply where rainfall and surface water do not always meet demand. It supports farms, households, and cities, but heavy extraction can turn groundwater into a long-term constraint when use exceeds natural recharge.

Service and infrastructure gaps

High basic drinking water access does not remove India’s water risk. Service quality, reliability, geography, and safely managed drinking water coverage can still vary, meaning water systems may remain uneven and vulnerable where supply is intermittent, infrastructure is weak, or water quality is difficult to maintain.

How pressure becomes visible

Water Stress

Water stress shows up through competing demand across agriculture, households, industry, and ecosystems.

Drinking Water Access

Drinking water pressure shows up through access, quality, reliability, and service differences between places and populations.

Drought and Variability

Drought and climate variability amplify water pressure by reducing supply reliability and increasing seasonal exposure.

What the numbers suggest

Water stress is a resource signal

With water stress at 66.5%, pressure on available water resources is high enough to shape the broader national water picture, not just isolated local shortages.

Access does not erase risk

Basic drinking water access at 95.7% does not remove underlying water risk, because service quality, reliability, and regional differences can still remain significant under high system pressure.

Agriculture is central to demand

Agricultural water use at 90.4% shows that farming remains the dominant driver of national water demand and a major source of long-term pressure on water systems.

Climate variability amplifies pressure

A drought exposure rating of Medium - High (0.6-0.8) means climate variability can intensify existing stress and make dry periods more disruptive for supply and reliability.

Long-Term Story

The longer-term story

This section combines trend evidence, forward-looking signals, and the broader country narrative.

Trend summary

India shows a persistent need to manage water demand, service resilience, and climate-related supply variability together.

Across public datasets, the overall picture is one of overlapping stress: demand pressures, uneven service outcomes, and climate-linked variability all contribute to the water risk profile.

Trend indicators

Basic drinking water access

95.7%

Most people in India have access to at least basic drinking water, but basic access does not always mean the service is fully safe, reliable, or continuously available. This metric should be read together with safely managed drinking water access.

Water stress

66.5%

India’s water stress is high, meaning freshwater withdrawals place strong pressure on available water resources. This makes water stress one of the clearest signals of India’s long-term water security challenge.

Population

1.5B

India’s very large population increases water demand across households, cities, agriculture, industry, and public services. Population size makes water management a national-scale challenge, especially where water stress and agricultural demand are already high. World Bank lists India’s 2024 population at about 1.45 billion, so 1.5B is a rounded display value.

What to watch

  • Whether agricultural water demand continues to increase pressure on India’s already stressed freshwater resources.
  • How drought exposure and climate variability affect drinking-water reliability, irrigation supply, and regional water security during dry periods.
  • Whether groundwater dependence becomes a larger long-term constraint for India’s farms, households, cities, and overall water security.
  • Whether safely managed drinking water, service quality, and supply reliability improve alongside India’s high basic drinking water access.

The story behind the data

India faces overlapping water pressures from demand, infrastructure, and climate variability.

Public datasets point to pressure across water availability, drinking water service conditions, and sectoral demand.

This profile should be read as a comparative public-data overview rather than a single harmonized statistical series.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about water risk in India

Is India facing a water crisis?

Yes. India faces a structural water-risk challenge, not just occasional water shortages. Water stress is high at 66.5%, agricultural water use is very high at 90.4% of total withdrawals, and drought exposure is Medium–High. This means pressure on India’s water resources can remain significant across seasons, especially where irrigation demand, groundwater use, and climate variability overlap.

What causes water stress in India?

India’s water stress is driven mainly by irrigation demand, very high agricultural water use, groundwater pressure, and climate variability. Agriculture accounts for 90.4% of total water withdrawals, making it the largest pressure point in India’s water profile. As a result, water risk in India is shaped not only by rainfall, but also by how water is used across farming, households, cities, and industry.

Does everyone in India have access to safe drinking water?

No. India has high basic drinking water access at 95.7%, but basic access does not mean every household receives water that is fully safe, reliable, and continuously available. Safely managed drinking water access is lower at 76.4%, showing that broad access and high-quality service are not the same. This gap makes water quality, reliability, and service management important parts of India’s water-risk profile.

Why is agriculture so important in India’s water risk?

Agriculture is central to India’s water risk because it accounts for 90.4% of total water withdrawals. This makes irrigation one of the main drivers of national water stress, especially in regions where farming depends on seasonal rainfall, groundwater, or large-scale irrigation systems. India’s water risk is therefore closely linked to food production, groundwater pressure, and the long-term sustainability of agricultural water use.

Sources

What powers this profile

Which source powers which metric

Methodology

How to read the data

This country profile combines World Bank API indicators with structured country feeds derived from JMP, AQUASTAT, and Aqueduct. Indicators come from different systems and years, so they should be interpreted together as a comparative public-data profile rather than a single harmonized statistical series.

FAO AQUASTAT SDG 6.4.2 water stress is a percentage-based national withdrawal indicator, while WRI Aqueduct baseline water stress is a separate risk-category system. These two metrics should be interpreted together, not treated as the same classification.

Data confidence

Indicators may come from different years and sources and should be interpreted together as a comparative public-data profile rather than a single harmonized statistical series.

Last updated: 22 May 2026

Scroll to Top